When it comes to understanding the vast and diverse spectrum of human sexuality, it is important to question and critically examine the concepts and stereotypes that society uses to categorize individuals. One concept that has been heavily debated is the idea of the “lipstick lesbian.” But what exactly is a lipstick lesbian and why is it so problematic?
A lipstick lesbian is a term used to describe feminine-presenting women who are attracted to other women. While this may seem harmless and inclusive on the surface, it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and reinforces the idea that there is a “right” or “wrong” way to be a lesbian. By using the term “lipstick lesbian” to differentiate between more feminine-presenting lesbians and those who do not conform to traditional beauty standards, we are essentially saying that one is better or more desirable than the other.
This concept goes against the fundamental principles of acceptance and respect for all individuals, regardless of their appearance or gender expression. It sends a message that femininity is somehow bad or lesser than masculinity, and that lesbians who adhere to traditional beauty standards are more acceptable or palatable to society.
Furthermore, the concept of the lipstick lesbian reinforces harmful stereotypes about the LGBTQ+ community. It feeds into the idea that all lesbians are either “butch” or “femme,” completely disregarding the reality that there is a diverse range of gender presentations within the lesbian community. This oversimplification not only erases the experiences of many lesbians, but also contributes to the marginalization of those who do not fit neatly into these boxes.
In conclusion, the concept of the lipstick lesbian is problematic because it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and reinforces the idea that one type of lesbian is more desirable or acceptable than another. It goes against the principles of acceptance and respect for all individuals, regardless of their appearance or gender expression. It is important to challenge these stereotypes and strive for a more inclusive and diverse understanding of human sexuality.
Misconceptions about femininity
Femininity is often misunderstood and misinterpreted, leading to a variety of misconceptions and stereotypes. In the context of the concept of a “lipstick lesbian,” these misconceptions become particularly problematic.
What many people fail to understand is that femininity is not limited to a specific appearance or behavior. It is an individual expression of identity that should be respected and valued, regardless of sexual orientation. Unfortunately, there is a stigma associated with femininity, particularly when it is embraced by lesbians.
Stereotypes about femininity often portray it as weak, submissive, and dependent. These stereotypes are not only inaccurate but also harmful. They perpetuate the idea that femininity is inferior and should be frowned upon. This creates an environment where lesbians who identify as feminine, such as “lipstick lesbians,” face discrimination and judgment from both the heterosexual and LGBTQ+ communities.
The negative connotations associated with femininity in the context of being a lesbian can lead to a variety of misconceptions. One misconception is that feminine lesbians are “pretending” or “acting.” This assumption undermines the authenticity of their identity and denies the validity of their experiences.
Moreover, the concept of a “lipstick lesbian” can reinforce the harmful idea that being feminine is inherently bad or lesser than being masculine. This kind of thinking perpetuates a hierarchy based on gender presentation and reinforces oppressive gender norms.
It is important to challenge these misconceptions and understand that femininity is diverse and multifaceted. All expressions of femininity should be celebrated and respected, regardless of sexual orientation. By breaking down stereotypes and stigmas, we can create a more inclusive and accepting society for everyone, including lipstick lesbians.
Stereotypical image of a lesbian
The stereotypical image of a lesbian often revolves around the concept of a “lipstick lesbian”. However, this concept is problematic for several reasons.
Firstly, it reinforces the idea that all lesbians are attracted to feminine-presenting women who wear makeup and dress in a stereotypically feminine way. This narrow definition of lesbianism fails to acknowledge the diversity within the lesbian community and perpetuates the idea that femininity is the only acceptable form of attraction.
Secondly, associating lesbians with the term “lipstick” can be seen as degrading or dismissive, as if it implies that lesbians who choose to wear lipstick are somehow “less gay” or not as valid in their identities. This is harmful and disrespectful, as it undermines the experiences and identities of those who identify as lipstick lesbians.
Furthermore, the concept of a lipstick lesbian can contribute to the stigma and discrimination faced by many lesbians. This stereotype suggests that being attracted to feminine-presenting women is more socially acceptable, while attraction to masculine-presenting women is frowned upon. This promotes the stigmatization of butch lesbians and contributes to a broader societal bias against non-normative expressions of gender and sexuality.
It is important to recognize that there is no one “correct” way to be a lesbian. Lesbians come in all shapes, sizes, and presentations, and their identities should be respected and celebrated. Instead of perpetuating harmful stereotypes, society should strive to create an inclusive and accepting environment for all individuals, regardless of their appearance or gender expression.
Perceived inauthenticity of femininity
The concept of “lipstick lesbian” carries with it the perception of inauthentic femininity. This perception is rooted in the belief that feminine lesbians who wear lipstick and adhere to certain stereotypical gender norms are not genuine or true to their lesbian identity.
Implicit in this perception is the idea that there is a right or wrong way to be a lesbian, with wearing lipstick being seen as a “bad” or lesser way of expressing one’s lesbianism. This stigma not only reinforces rigid gender roles and expectations but also implies that lesbians who do not adhere to these stereotypes are more genuine and authentic in their sexuality.
By perpetuating the notion that lipstick lesbians are not as legitimate or real as other lesbians, society further reinforces harmful stereotypes that are often used against the LGBTQ+ community. The policing of femininity in this way can contribute to a culture in which individuals feel pressured to either conform to societal norms or risk being frowned upon or ostracized.
It is important to challenge and question the notion that there is a right or wrong way to be a lesbian, as it is against the principles of acceptance and inclusivity. Lesbian women should be free to express themselves and their femininity however they choose, without facing judgment or stigma.
Ultimately, it is crucial to dispel the notion of inauthenticity associated with the concept of a lipstick lesbian and recognize that femininity can take many forms. Everyone should be encouraged to embrace their own individuality and express themselves authentically, without being confined to societal expectations or stereotypes.
Reinforces gender stereotypes
The concept of “lipstick lesbian” is often frowned upon because it reinforces gender stereotypes and perpetuates harmful beliefs about sexual orientation. This term implies that lesbians who choose to embrace their femininity and present themselves in a traditionally feminine way through fashion and grooming are somehow “bad” or not authentic.
What this does is contribute to a stigma against lipstick lesbians and further marginalizes them within the LGBTQ+ community. It suggests that lesbians who do not fit into this narrow definition of femininity are not valid or not as accepted.
By promoting the idea that lipstick lesbians are more socially acceptable or desirable, it reinforces the notion that femininity is the ideal form of expression for women, and that lesbians must conform to traditional gender roles and expectations. This ultimately perpetuates harmful stereotypes about women and reinforces a binary understanding of gender.
It is important to recognize and challenge these stereotypes, as they can lead to discrimination and prejudice. Embracing diversity within the lesbian community and celebrating the range of identities and expressions helps to break down these harmful beliefs and create a more inclusive and accepting society.
Associating femininity with heterosexuality
One of the main reasons why the concept of “lipstick lesbian” is problematic is because it reinforces the idea that femininity is inherently linked to heterosexuality. This association not only perpetuates societal stereotypes about gender and sexuality, but it also invalidates the experiences and identities of lesbians who do not fit into this narrow definition of what it means to be feminine.
The concept of a “lipstick lesbian” implies that only feminine-presenting lesbians are valid or desirable, while those who do not conform to traditional feminine stereotypes are often frowned upon. This not only creates a stigma around non-conforming lesbians, but also puts pressure on feminine-presenting lesbians to constantly perform their femininity and conform to societal expectations.
Furthermore, this association between femininity and heterosexuality can lead to the erasure of lesbians who do not fit into these stereotypes. It suggests that feminine-presenting lesbians are not “real” lesbians and that their sexuality should be questioned or invalidated. This erasure contributes to the marginalization of these individuals and reinforces harmful stereotypes about lesbianism.
It is important to recognize and challenge these stereotypes in order to create a more inclusive and accepting society. By questioning the concept of “lipstick lesbian” and understanding the harmful effects it can have, we can work towards breaking down these stereotypes and celebrating the diversity of experiences and identities within the lesbian community.
Pressure to conform to societal expectations
One of the reasons why the concept of “lipstick lesbian” is problematic is because it reinforces societal pressures to conform to certain expectations. Society tends to frown upon those who do not fit into traditional gender roles, and the term “lipstick lesbian” implies that lesbians who do not conform to these roles are somehow against the norm.
This pressure to conform can be harmful and isolating for many individuals. It creates a binary view of gender and sexuality, suggesting that there are predetermined ways to express femininity or masculinity. This can lead to a sense of inadequacy and self-doubt for those who do not fit within these narrow confines.
Furthermore, this concept perpetuates harmful stereotypes. It suggests that lesbian women who choose to express their femininity through makeup and fashion are somehow “better” or more accepted than those who do not. This reinforces the idea that femininity is superior to other forms of expression and that women must conform to certain standards in order to be considered legitimate.
It is important to challenge these societal expectations and reject the notion that there is a “right” or “wrong” way to be a lesbian. All individuals should be free to express themselves authentically, without feeling the need to conform to external pressures or stereotypes.
Why is there a stigma against lipstick lesbians?
The concept of lipstick lesbians has been often frowned upon and stigmatized in society. This stigma exists due to certain misconceptions and stereotypes surrounding the term.
First and foremost, there is a misconception that lipstick lesbians are not “real” lesbians because they present themselves in a more feminine manner. This belief stems from the assumption that lesbians should conform to a certain appearance or behavior that is more traditionally associated with masculinity. The idea that femininity and homosexuality are mutually exclusive is not only false but also reinforces harmful gender norms and stereotypes.
Additionally, there is a belief that lipstick lesbians are attention-seeking or doing it for the male gaze. This assumption is rooted in a heteronormative view of sexuality, which assumes that any expression of same-sex attraction must be for the pleasure or validation of the opposite gender. This perception undermines the genuine love and attraction that lipstick lesbians have towards other women and invalidates their identities.
Furthermore, the stigma against lipstick lesbians can be attributed to the lack of representation and visibility in media and popular culture. Mainstream media often portray lesbian women in a limited and stereotypical way, which tends to exclude those who do not fit into the traditional butch or masculine lesbian archetype. This lack of diverse representation further reinforces the idea that lipstick lesbians do not fit the “typical” lesbian mold and are therefore deemed as less authentic or valid.
It is important to challenge and break down this stigma against lipstick lesbians. Acceptance and understanding should be given to all individuals, regardless of their preferred gender expression or appearance. Embracing and celebrating the diversity within the lesbian community is crucial in creating an inclusive and supportive society.
Invalidation of sexual orientation
The concept of “lipstick lesbian” is problematic because it perpetuates the stigma surrounding lesbians and invalidates their sexual orientation. This term is often used to describe feminine lesbians who embrace their femininity while also identifying as queer. However, the term “lipstick lesbian” has been frowned upon by the LGBTQ+ community due to its association with stereotypes and the misguided notion that feminine lesbians are somehow not “real” lesbians.
What makes this concept particularly bad is the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes about lesbians. By using the term “lipstick lesbian,” it suggests that there is a specific way in which lesbians should look or behave. This creates a rigid expectation that undermines the diverse experiences and expressions of lesbians, reinforcing the idea that femininity and homosexuality are mutually exclusive.
Furthermore, the term implies that feminine lesbians need to justify or prove their sexual orientation, which is inherently invalidating. It suggests that unless a lesbian adheres to a stereotypical masculine appearance or behavior, her identity and attraction to women are not valid or legitimate.
It is important to recognize and challenge these stereotypes and unfair expectations placed on lesbians. Sexual orientation should be respected regardless of how an individual chooses to express themselves. The concept of “lipstick lesbian” fails to acknowledge the complexity and diversity of lesbian experiences, ultimately contributing to the marginalization of this community.
Ignorance and disbelief
One of the main reasons why the concept of lipstick lesbian is frowned upon is due to the ignorance and disbelief surrounding it. Many people do not understand or believe that someone can be feminine and attracted to women at the same time. This disbelief stems from stereotypes and stigma that have been perpetuated in society for a long time.
There is a common misconception that lipstick lesbians are not “real” lesbians, as if their femininity somehow invalidates their sexual orientation. This belief is rooted in the idea that lesbians should fit a certain stereotype, such as being more masculine in appearance and behavior. By labeling some lesbians as “lipstick,” it creates a divide within the community and reinforces harmful stereotypes. It also implies that there is something wrong or unnatural about being feminine and attracted to women.
The stigma against lipstick lesbians can also be seen in the way they are often fetishized or objectified. The term “lipstick lesbian” is often used in a sexualized manner, reducing these women to nothing more than sexual fantasies for others. This objectification contributes to the overall devaluation of their identities and experiences.
It is important to challenge these misconceptions and stereotypes, and recognize that there is no one way to be a lesbian. The concept of lipstick lesbian should not be used to invalidate or marginalize the experiences of feminine lesbians, but rather to celebrate and embrace the diversity within the community.
Perception of “faking it for attention”
The concept of lipstick lesbians can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and contribute to negative perceptions of lesbian women. One problematic perception associated with this concept is the idea that some women may be “faking it” or adopting a lesbian identity solely for attention or to fulfill male fantasies.
This perception is rooted in the assumption that feminine-presenting lesbians are not authentic or genuine in their sexual orientation. It implies that their attraction to other women is not legitimate, but rather a performance to attract the male gaze or gain attention. Such a perception not only undermines the individual experiences and identities of lipstick lesbians, but also reinforces stereotypes about lesbians as a whole.
Labeling feminine-presenting lesbians as “faking it for attention” can be seen as discriminatory and invalidating. It implies that there is a “right” or “authentic” way to be a lesbian, and those who do not fit into this narrow definition are considered lesser or not “real” lesbians. This stigma can create a hostile environment for lipstick lesbians, making it difficult for them to be accepted within both the LGBTQ+ community and society at large.
It is important to challenge these perceptions and recognize that there is no one way to be a lesbian. Individuals have the right to express their sexuality and identity in ways that feel authentic to them. Frowning upon or dismissing lipstick lesbians as “faking it for attention” is harmful and perpetuates the false notion that femininity and queer identity are mutually exclusive.
It is essential to break down these stereotypes and challenge the stigma surrounding feminine-presenting lesbians. Recognizing and celebrating the diversity within the lesbian community is crucial for creating a more inclusive and accepting society.
Threat to heteronormative norms
The concept of lipstick lesbians poses a threat to heteronormative norms by challenging the traditional understanding of feminine and masculine roles within society. Heteronormativity is the belief that heterosexuality is the norm and that individuals should fall into predetermined gender roles and conform to societal expectations.
Why is the concept of lipstick lesbians problematic? First, it carries a stigma, implying that lesbians who embrace their femininity are somehow less genuine or not as “real” as other lesbians. This stigma can lead to judgment and exclusion within the LGBTQ+ community and reinforces the idea that there is a “right” way to be a lesbian.
Furthermore, the idea of lipstick lesbians is often frowned upon by both heterosexual and homosexual individuals who hold conservative views, reinforcing negative attitudes toward same-sex relationships. This disapproval of non-conforming gender roles can contribute to the discrimination and marginalization of individuals who identify as lipstick lesbians.
By perpetuating the notion that there is a “good” and “bad” way to be a lesbian, the concept of lipstick lesbians reinforces harmful stereotypes and expectations about femininity and homosexuality. It reinforces the idea that femininity is only valid when it aligns with traditional heteronormative standards, creating a narrow and restrictive understanding of gender expression.
In conclusion, the concept of lipstick lesbians poses a threat to heteronormative norms because it challenges traditional gender roles and expectations. It is important to recognize and accept diverse expressions of femininity and understand that there is no “right” or “wrong” way to be a lesbian. Acceptance and celebration of diverse identities are crucial steps towards creating a more inclusive and equitable society for all individuals.
Disrupting binary views of sexual orientation
The concept of a “lipstick lesbian” is often frowned upon and carries a stigma within society. But what exactly is a lipstick lesbian, and why is it considered problematic?
A lipstick lesbian is a term used to describe feminine-presenting lesbians who often embrace more traditionally feminine traits and fashion. The term “lipstick lesbian” implies that these women can be easily identified by their appearance, reinforcing the belief that lesbian women must adhere to specific stereotypes.
This binary view of sexual orientation creates a divide within the lesbian community and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. It suggests that there are two types of lesbians: those who conform to traditional notions of femininity and those who do not. By categorizing lesbians in this way, it further marginalizes non-conforming lesbians and implies that their orientation is somehow “wrong” or less valid.
By disrupting these binary views of sexual orientation, we can challenge the stigma surrounding the concept of a “lipstick lesbian” and promote a more inclusive understanding of lesbian identity. Sexual orientation should not be defined by appearance or adherence to societal norms, but rather by an individual’s emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attraction to others.
It is important to recognize that lesbian women come in all different presentations and expressions, and each individual should be respected and accepted for who they are without judgement or pressure to conform to specific stereotypes.
Challenging traditional gender roles
Stereotypes and societal expectations surrounding gender roles have long been a subject of debate and criticism. Traditional gender roles, which prescribe certain behavior and attributes based on one’s biological sex, can be detrimental to individuals and limit their self-expression. It is important to challenge these traditional gender roles and strive for a more inclusive and accepting society.
One way in which people challenge traditional gender roles is by embracing and expressing their true selves, regardless of societal expectations. This includes individuals who identify as “lipstick lesbians,” who are attracted to other women and also embrace traditionally feminine qualities and aesthetics.
However, the concept of a “lipstick lesbian” can be problematic. It reinforces the narrow definition of what it means to be a woman, implying that women who do not conform to these feminine stereotypes are somehow “bad” or deviant. This creates a stigma around certain expressions of femininity and can lead to discrimination and exclusion.
Using the term “lipstick lesbian” also implies that there is a need to categorize and label individuals based on their appearance or interests. This can further perpetuate stereotypes and reinforces the idea that gender and sexuality should be rigidly defined. It contributes to the notion that people should fit into predefined boxes rather than embracing the complexity and diversity of human experiences.
It is important to challenge these stereotypes and stigma associated with the concept of a “lipstick lesbian.” It is unfair to judge and frown upon individuals who choose to express their femininity in a way they feel comfortable with. People should have the freedom to express themselves authentically, without fear of discrimination or judgment.
Overall, it is crucial to question why the concept of “lipstick lesbian” is against the idea of challenging traditional gender roles. It is important to move towards a more inclusive and accepting society, where individuals can freely express their gender and sexuality without being constrained by societal expectations.
Why is lipstick lesbian frowned upon?
The concept of lipstick lesbian is frowned upon due to the perpetuation of stereotypes and the stigma against lesbians.
| What is a lipstick lesbian? | A lipstick lesbian is a term commonly used to describe a lesbian who presents herself in a more feminine or conventionally attractive manner. This includes wearing makeup, dresses, and engaging in other traditionally feminine behaviors. |
| Why is it problematic? | The term “lipstick lesbian” can be seen as problematic because it reinforces the idea that being a lesbian is only acceptable or palatable if a woman conforms to societal norms of femininity. It implies that lesbians who do not fit this stereotype are somehow less valid or less desirable. This can lead to exclusion and marginalization of lesbians who don’t fit into this narrow definition. |
| Stigma against lesbians | The stigma against lesbians stems from society’s heteronormative expectations and the perception that homosexuality is deviant. By classifying lesbians into categories like “lipstick” or “butch,” society continues to reinforce harmful stereotypes and limit the way lesbians can express themselves. This stigma can lead to prejudice, discrimination, and even violence against lesbians. |
It is important to challenge and question the societal norms and expectations that contribute to the frowning upon of the lipstick lesbian concept. All lesbians, regardless of how they present themselves, deserve respect, acceptance, and equal treatment.
Lack of acceptance within LGBTQ+ community
The concept of lipstick lesbian is riddled with a lack of acceptance within the LGBTQ+ community. Many individuals within this community feel that the term perpetuates stereotypes and excludes those who do not fit into this particular image of a lesbian.
What makes this lack of acceptance even more problematic is the stigma surrounding the concept of a lipstick lesbian. Many view it as a way to label and categorize individuals, which can lead to discrimination and prejudice. This discrimination is often present within the LGBTQ+ community itself, where those who identify as lipstick lesbians may be frowned upon or even ostracized.
It is important to challenge these stereotypes and promote acceptance within the LGBTQ+ community. By adhering to the belief that a particular type of lesbian is superior or more valid than another, we not only create divisions within the community, but also reinforce a negative perception of those who identify as lipstick lesbians.
The notion that being a lipstick lesbian is somehow “bad” or “less than” other lesbians is not only damaging to individuals who identify with this term, but also undermines the diversity and inclusivity that should be celebrated within the LGBTQ+ community. It is crucial to recognize and embrace the various ways in which individuals can identify within this community, without perpetuating harmful stereotypes or discriminating against those who do not conform to certain expectations.
In conclusion, the lack of acceptance for the concept of lipstick lesbians within the LGBTQ+ community is problematic due to the stigma, stereotypes, and discrimination that it promotes. It is essential that we challenge these harmful beliefs and work towards fostering a more inclusive and accepting environment for all members of the LGBTQ+ community, regardless of how they identify.
Stereotyping and exclusion
Lesbians have long faced stereotypes and exclusion from society, and the concept of a “lipstick lesbian” only perpetuates these negative beliefs. These stereotypes often portray lesbians in a negative light and reinforce harmful ideas about their appearance, behavior, and sexuality.
It is important to understand why the concept of a “lipstick lesbian” is problematic. By categorizing lesbians based on the way they present themselves, it creates a hierarchy within the lesbian community, implying that certain lesbians are more desirable or legitimate than others. This not only perpetuates harmful stereotypes, but also creates division and exclusion within the community itself.
The concept of a “lipstick lesbian” also contributes to the stigma and discrimination that lesbians already face. Society often frowns upon those who do not conform to traditional gender norms, and by associating femininity with lesbianism, it reinforces the idea that being a lesbian is somehow “bad” or deviant. This further marginalizes and stigmatizes the lesbian community, making it harder for lesbians to be accepted and respected.
It is important to recognize that lesbians come in all shapes, sizes, and styles, and that their femininity or lack thereof does not determine their worth or legitimacy. Stereotyping and categorizing lesbians based on their appearance only serves to perpetuate discrimination and exclusion, and goes against the principles of acceptance and equality.
Instead, we should challenge these stereotypes and embrace the diversity within the lesbian community. By educating ourselves and others about the harmful effects of stereotypes, we can work towards creating a more inclusive society that celebrates and respects all lesbians, regardless of how they choose to express themselves.
Question-answer:
What is the concept of “lipstick lesbian”?
The concept of “lipstick lesbian” refers to a feminine lesbian woman who typically presents herself in a stylish and feminine manner. It’s a term used to describe lesbians who are conventionally attractive and enjoy traditionally feminine fashion and beauty practices.
Why is the concept of “lipstick lesbian” considered problematic?
The concept of “lipstick lesbian” is considered problematic because it reinforces stereotypes and imposes a limited and narrow definition of what it means to be a lesbian. It suggests that femininity is reserved only for heterosexual women and perpetuates the idea that lesbians need to adhere to certain standards of appearance in order to be valid or accepted.
Does the term “lipstick lesbian” undermine the diversity of the LGBTQ+ community?
Yes, the term “lipstick lesbian” undermines the diversity of the LGBTQ+ community by reducing complex identities and experiences to simplistic categories based on appearance. It erases the experiences of lesbians who don’t conform to traditional femininity, and fails to recognize the wide range of expressions and identities within the lesbian community.
How does the concept of “lipstick lesbian” contribute to the sexualization and objectification of women?
The concept of “lipstick lesbian” contributes to the sexualization and objectification of women by reducing them to their appearance and perpetuating the idea that their value lies primarily in their attractiveness to others. It reinforces the toxic idea that women exist to be looked at and desired, rather than recognized as individuals with their own agency, desires, and identities.
Why is it important to challenge and move away from the concept of “lipstick lesbian”?
It is important to challenge and move away from the concept of “lipstick lesbian” in order to promote inclusivity and acceptance within the lesbian community. By embracing diversity and recognizing that there are countless ways to be a lesbian, we can create a more inclusive and supportive environment for all individuals. It is also crucial to challenge harmful stereotypes and promote the idea that femininity and lesbian identity are not mutually exclusive.
What does the term “lipstick lesbian” mean?
The term “lipstick lesbian” is used to describe a feminine lesbian who embraces her femininity and expresses it through her appearance and style.
Why is the concept of lipstick lesbian problematic?
The concept of lipstick lesbian is problematic because it reinforces gender stereotypes and the idea that sexuality is based on appearance. It suggests that only feminine lesbians are valid, while disregarding the diversity of lesbian experiences and identities.
Does being a lipstick lesbian make someone less valid as a lesbian?
No, being a lipstick lesbian does not make someone less valid as a lesbian. However, it is important to recognize that the concept of lipstick lesbian can be limiting and exclusive, as it promotes a narrow definition of what it means to be a lesbian.